RE: Douk is a negative word to my
generation.
Dear Editor,
Yesterday when a friend of mine from the Kootenays pointed out that an
article in the December 14th, 2005, issue of
Iskra was ‘for the shits’,
I took notice. I guess I missed reading ‘How Miss Grinchoff Stole
Christmas’.
Indeed, the article in question was of bad taste. The repeated use of
the word ‘Douk’, ‘Douk-Ville’ and ‘Douk-borshch’ is derogatory and
belongs to the dustbin of history.
Years back in the late 1950s, as editor of
The Inquirer, the
Vancouver
Sun challenged me to do a study to show that sensational
headlines and
careless handling of news had been the cause of discrimination to
minority groups such as the Doukhobors. After looking at 34 daily
and weekly newspapers in BC, I discovered that the use of the word
‘Douk’ was used in 15 percent of all the headings in the sample and in
most of these cases the referent was inaccurate and often prejudiced by
innuendo. The December 18, 1957 issue of the
Vancouver Sun, for
example, had a glaring front page prejudicial headline ‘Douk Bomb
Blasts Peril 4 Officials’.
I
also found that
CBC in 1957
had forbidden the use of words that like ‘Douk’ are considered
to be derogatory to color, nationality or religion. Among these words
are “Yank’, ‘kike’, ‘coon’, ‘dago’, ‘wop’, ‘limey’, ‘Jap’, ‘Chink’ and
‘Bohunk’. Surely,
Iskra should
avoid these derogatory titles and follow
good journalistic policies. After all, you are part of the public trust
that sets a good example.
Happy New Year to you and your staff.
Koozma J. Tarasoff, Ottawa, Ontairo
Ed. Note: We are sorry that anyone would take offense to the story
mentioned in this letter. However, the entire message in that story was
clearly completely missed by those who were offended by a single word.
Please see the editorial in this issue.